Michael Heavey defends the principle of freedom of speech by insisting that Alan Page is perfectly entitled to his views on hunting (Oxford Mail, July 24).
Yet, at the same time, he condemns animal rights' defenders for criticising Mr Page for making a series of major errors in his letters.
Am I missing something?
If Mr Page is entitled to express his opinions - and few would argue with that sentiment - then surely so is everyone else, even if their views do not meet Mr Heavey's approval?
Mr Heavey cannot have it both ways.
JIM CRAWFORD Burton Place Oxford
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article