Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email »
3:07pm Thursday 7th February 2008
The amount of fuel being used by Oxford City Council's bin and recycling lorries has risen by a third since the introduction of fortnightly waste collection.
Former Labour county councillor John Power used the Freedom of Information Act to find out the amount used before and after the introduction of the fortnightly waste collection scheme in November 2006.
The scheme, which introduced wheelie bins across the city, brought a big increase in the recycling rate, from 24 per cent to 40 per cent in parts of Oxford.
But, according to new figures, the council is paying for its success because it is having to spend 32 per cent more on diesel fuel - because of frequent trips to a Milton Keynes centre where rubbish is recycled.
Mr Power said the council was spending a third more on fuel - not helped by the general rise in fuel costs.
"There is a cost consideration as well as the pollution to consider. I think this is a clear indication that the council should return to weekly collections.
"The council is burning up more fuel just to get a better recycling rate and that must be adding to the carbon footprint in a congested city like Oxford."
According to John Evans, the council's information rights manager, figures recorded for the council's core refuse fleet show that in 2005, from May to December, bin lorries and recycling lorries used 143,815.52 litres of fuel.
In the same period in 2007, the lorries used 190,273.03 litres, an increase of 46,458 litres.
Jean Fooks, executive member for a cleaner city, said council vehicles had made trips to Milton Keynes since the fortnightly collection was introduced to dispose of cans, plastic bottles, cardboard and low-grade paper.
Newspapers collected in green boxes are transported to Kent.
Ms Fooks added: "The increased use of fuel is more than offset by the reduction in what we are sending to landfill.
"Our blue box recyclables are taken to a state-of-the-art materials recycling facility at Milton Keynes, where it is sorted and sold on as a raw material.
"We are looking to find a nearer outlet to reduce mileage and carbon emissions.
"Reducing the tonnage sent to landfill is reducing emissions of potent greenhouse gases.
"Composting garden waste for use on agricultural land instead of sending it to landfill reduces our contribution to climate change."
The county council is currently deciding where to put an incinerator to deal with the county's non-recycable waste.
Green city councillor Craig Simmons said: "The amount of carbon dioxide emitted from the fuel is trivial compared to the amount saved by not having to manufacture new materials."
Andrew Wood, a spokesman for Oxford Friends of the Earth, added: "The council could reduce its fuel bill by creating its own sorting facility for mixed waste somewhere in the county."
Mike, Bicester says...
7:52pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Soldierf, England says...
8:22pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Ken, Oxford says...
8:43pm Thu 7 Feb 08
Soldierf wrote:You are not alone with these thoughts.
RECYCLING A WASTE OF TIME, MONEY AND ENERGY FOR NOTHING!! What a waste to carefully separate our rubbish for recycling just to see much of it dumped into the same bin to go for landfill or worse still exported to China to be 'Recycled'!! But can't you all see that much of our 'post consumer recycling' is the biggest con of our time! By the time energy has been used to transport, clean and process our rubbish we might as well have made the stuff from scratch! Paper recycling does not EVEN save trees (and the de-inking process during recycling produces one million tonnes of toxic sludge per year in the UK which is sent to landfill!) and the current value of one tonne of mixed household paper is just £3! It is much better to REUSE glassware than to send it halfway round the country to be expensively remelted to make what we had anyway! (is that mad or what!) and we currently have a 'Green glass mountain' of wine bottles that cannot even be recycled because we import almost all of our wine. So this glass is being landfilled many miles from where it was collected or sent at our expense abroad. And there are seven main kinds of plastics that must not be mixed or contaminated if they are to be successfully recycled. (Much plastic recycled is merely being 'downcycled' into other products which only really delays its journey to landfill or incineration). Transporting plastic bottle is like carrying a truck load of balloons around the country. How many more recycle lorries do we need? One for glass? One for paper? One for plastic? And even one to collect our compost (can we all not compost our own green waste at home?) And finally one for our general waste? I beg you to work it out for yourself. This kind of recycling does not save energy, does not save resources and is just one giant CON!
Simon, Oxford says...
12:52pm Fri 8 Feb 08
Roger, Oxford says...
12:57pm Fri 8 Feb 08
Jongo, Oxon says...
4:53pm Fri 8 Feb 08
nicky F1, OXFORD says...
7:31pm Sat 9 Feb 08
Jon Fray, Kingston Upon Thames says...
10:45am Thu 28 Feb 08
soldierf, UK says...
11:33pm Sun 2 Mar 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Oxford Mail account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire now!
Search Now »
Oxfordshire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
purplechicken, bicester says...
5:39pm Thu 7 Feb 08
No wonder they want to charge us for the use of public toilets,there is an alterior motive?