Your Oxford
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email »
Meadow housing refusal goes to appeal
9:00am Friday 11th May 2007
The health trust which wants to build a student village on a meadow site is appealing against councillors' refusal to approve the scheme.
A scheme to develop the land next to Warneford Hospital, in Headington, Oxford, is bitterly opposed by locals.
And the health trust was last month told to return to the drawing board with its plans to build on Warneford Meadow, Warneford Hospital playing field and land at the Park Hospital.
But with the Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust hoping to raise millions from the development, it has lodged an appeal with the Planning Inspectorate.
Trust chief executive Julie Waldron said an appeal over the decision not to grant outline planning permission was the only way to avoid long delays.
She said: "It's very disappointing to have to take this step. But the council's own papers recommended giving approval for our plans.
"We are at a loss to know why the planning officers didn't maintain this advice on the day of the council's strategic development control committee meeting."
The trust wants to build accommodation for more than 1,000 Oxford Brookes University students, healthcare and key workers. The development would also include offices and research buildings.
Councillors were unhappy that five separate applications were submitted. They were asked to approve the scheme in principle, with details to be finalised later.
The Friends of Warneford Meadow said the development would destroy 20 acres of open meadow within the city, widely used by the local community, and worsen Headington's traffic congestion. They are now seeking to have the meadow registered as a town green.
Floris van den Broecke, from the Friends, said: "This action by the trust shows their contempt for the community with no regard to strong local and wider opinion.
"The city council clearly sent the trust back to the drawing board. But the trust insists on throwing good taxpayers' money after bad.
"The applicants have already received special treatment from the planners."
Your Say YourOxford
Sid Hunt, says...
10:16am Fri 11 May 07
They were asked to approve the scheme in principle, with details to be finalised later.
How on earth could any approval be given with no accurate specification? They are not being upfront about what they intend to build and are steamrollering over local opinon and local needs. This 'health' trust should consider more closely the detrimental effects of removing green spaces.
C, says...
10:20am Fri 11 May 07
I can't help feeling that the reasons behind all this are rather questionable anyway, probably the likes of someone's personal career advancement: certainly the needs of the hospital's patients and the local community don't seem to figure highly in their proposal.
C, says...
10:26am Fri 11 May 07
I'm not under any misapprehension that this attempt to build on the meadow is for a short-term one-off financial gain
Should read "is for anything other than a short-term ... gain".
JC, Oxford says...
6:48pm Fri 11 May 07
Your sayYourOxford
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Oxford Mail account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
In this section
Sponsored Links
Local Advertisers
Local Information
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Eddy, Oxford says...
10:02am Fri 11 May 07
Interesting how the trust placed accommodation before saying the development would include offices and research buildings. Call me a cynic, but it IS good psychology. It would have looked far less appealing and less community minded if it placed accommodation last.
I totally agree with Floris van den Broecke comment