Flooding News
FIND A DATE
Use our Two's Company section to find a date or maybe something more permanent
| ON ME HEAD
Into your sport then check out the Sport Editor's blog
| KNOW YOUR FATE
Want to know what life has in store? Check out our horoscopes
| ON YER BIKE
Get the view from the gutter with cycling group Cyclox in Oxfordshire
|
|
|
|
Flood defences 'waste of money'
 |
| Alison Cobb |
Flood victims have reacted angrily after being told that protecting their homes from rising water is "ultimately" down to them.
Insurance firm Norwich Union claims 95 per cent of people hit by floods last summer have not taken measures since then to protect their own homes.
And residents' groups in Oxfordshire suggested the figure could be even higher, as homeowners are put off by the high cost of flood defences.
They said it could cost up to £3,000 for door and window seals, and up to £1,000 for pumps for a house.
Colin Howes, of Bullstake Close, off Botley Road, Oxford, whose house was inundated last year, said: "It's a waste of money and a lot to spend for nothing. There's only so much you can do as an individual."
Norwich Union said its premiums would reflect protective measures taken by customers in flood-prone areas.
And the Environment Agency and Oxfordshire County Council also urged people to protect their homes.
John Kelly, the council's emergency planning officer, said: "Ultimately, it comes back to the individuals.
"In my view, the pressure should be on the commercial companies, the insurers, to co-ordinate residents and provide incentives for them to improve their homes."
But Mr Howes said councils and the Environment Agency were not doing enough to help.
Residents in West Oxford are still feeling the effects of the floods last July.
Fewer than half the houses in Earl Street are habitable yet, with the rest still under repair.
Andy Webber, who lives in the road, said: "People just can't afford it. The onus is being placed on individuals to protect themselves and you don't get any help. It's disgusting what's going on here."
Richard Thurston, of the Oxford Flood Alliance, set up by residents of areas at risk of flooding, warned only joint measures would solve the problem.
He said: "People will go ahead and take action, but you have to think about everyone. We have got to work collectively to solve this."
Flood victims say that installing a pump, while neighbouring homes did not, would merely mean some were worse affected than others.
But an Environment Agency spokesman said: "There is always something people can do to protect their properties.
"Even if they take action as simple as keeping important documents in a waterproof folder, these actions can save money.
"Every one of us has a responsibility to be prepared for flooding."
A spokesman for Norwich Union said: "If people put flood defences in place, then it will be taken into account in their premiums.
"We would always recommend using kitemarked products."
Alison Cobb believes measures to protect her home in Binsey Lane, Oxford, would be futile, because it is on the River Thames flood plain.
She said: "You can have pump systems and you can have barriers, but we can't avoid it in this area. We're surrounded by water. It just wells up.
"There isn't very much which can be done to stop the flow. You have to distinguish between those who live on a flood plain and those who are flooded by surface water.
"We pay our taxes, so the council or the Government should be supplying flood defences."
Alan Barringer, 38, of Abingdon Road, Didcot, decided to build his own brick flood barrier to protect his and his neighbours' homes after last July's flooding. He said: "We dealt with the problem ourselves, because no-one else seemed to want to.
"I don't see it being a long-term solution. It's like a dam on the field drain and it only allows a certain amount of water through to the other side."
6:35am Tuesday 15th April 2008
Print 
Email this
CommentPosted by: Mr Ison, England on 10:41am Tue 15 Apr 08
Taking a good look at the so called housing stock i do believe judicious use of the Bulldozer would be an improvement.
Everywhere you care to go has these tatty houses thrown up on the cheap to maximise profits for speculators.
The Government of today is importing inhabitants for these slums and in so doing compounds the problem.
Who wants to pay a third of a million pounds for an eyesore property in an area overun with foreigners?
The answer to that is no one.
Taking a good look at the so called housing stock i do believe judicious use of the Bulldozer would be an improvement.
Everywhere you care to go has these tatty houses thrown up on the cheap to maximise profits for speculators.
The Government of today is importing inhabitants for these slums and in so doing compounds the problem.
Who wants to pay a third of a million pounds for an eyesore property in an area overun with foreigners?
The answer to that is no one.
Posted by: Gaston, Headington on 11:02am Tue 15 Apr 08
"We pay our taxes, so the council or the Government should be supplying flood defences"
and presumambly burglar alarms, CCTV for each house, gates, walls etc.
I would be interested to know where [bold]in law[/bold] , councils or government have an obligation to protect individual properties
"We pay our taxes, so the council or the Government should be supplying flood defences"
and presumambly burglar alarms, CCTV for each house, gates, walls etc.
I would be interested to know where
in law , councils or government have an obligation to protect individual properties
Posted by: Any Body, oxford on 11:39am Tue 15 Apr 08
DOWN TO THE HOME OWNER TO PROTECT THEIR OWN HOME....HOW SHOCKING
ITS ABOUT TIME SOMEONE POINTED THIS OUT. Home ownership...its not just about making money folks.
DOWN TO THE HOME OWNER TO PROTECT THEIR OWN HOME....HOW SHOCKING
ITS ABOUT TIME SOMEONE POINTED THIS OUT. Home ownership...its not just about making money folks.
Posted by: Andrew, Oxford on 12:26pm Tue 15 Apr 08
The home owners should seek independence from Oxford City Council and create their own local council into which they pay "Council Tax" instead. From these funds they can then choose to build serious river defences.
Problem solved.
The home owners should seek independence from Oxford City Council and create their own local council into which they pay "Council Tax" instead. From these funds they can then choose to build serious river defences.
Problem solved.
Posted by: Laura, headington on 3:17pm Tue 15 Apr 08
or people could simpaly chose not to live on flood plains
or people could simpaly chose not to live on flood plains
Posted by: steve, botley on 3:45pm Tue 15 Apr 08
Fair play, if you choose to buy a house on a known flood plain, then you should expect to pay for the needed defences. But when the council decide (against the advice of the Environment agency) to allow new homes to be build on flood plains and by doing so make houses which were "safe" now at risk, then I think the council should take some responsibility! Not all of it, but the solution to some of these problems can be resolved by adiquate planning further up river and this NEEDS the council to make happen.
Fair play, if you choose to buy a house on a known flood plain, then you should expect to pay for the needed defences. But when the council decide (against the advice of the Environment agency) to allow new homes to be build on flood plains and by doing so make houses which were "safe" now at risk, then I think the council should take some responsibility! Not all of it, but the solution to some of these problems can be resolved by adiquate planning further up river and this NEEDS the council to make happen.
Posted by: Henry, oxford on 5:07pm Tue 15 Apr 08
The trouble is nobody can take the blame or responsibilty for thier own property. It is not the councils fault. If you live on a floodplain then you are more stupid then I thought. Tough luck!
The trouble is nobody can take the blame or responsibilty for thier own property. It is not the councils fault. If you live on a floodplain then you are more stupid then I thought. Tough luck!
Posted by: Steve, Botley on 7:43pm Tue 15 Apr 08
My house wasn't on the flood plain until the old flood plain had been sold off for development by the council. If they are able to make a profit by the sale and the knock on effect is my house is now at risk. I think they do have some responsibiliy. It's not rocket science.
I was fine. they changed the water way against the advice of the environment agency now I am at flood risk.
My house wasn't on the flood plain until the old flood plain had been sold off for development by the council. If they are able to make a profit by the sale and the knock on effect is my house is now at risk. I think they do have some responsibiliy. It's not rocket science.
I was fine. they changed the water way against the advice of the environment agency now I am at flood risk.
Posted by: Dave, Botley on 8:37pm Tue 15 Apr 08
I lived in Earl St for 25 years until 1989 and we were NEVER flooded. Yes it came close but the flood plain did its job. Since then the flood plain has been built on and ditches and drains aren't maintained - result 3 floods in last 10 years. Councils and Environment agency must be brought to task to do their job and the houses built on the flood plain removed.
I lived in Earl St for 25 years until 1989 and we were NEVER flooded. Yes it came close but the flood plain did its job. Since then the flood plain has been built on and ditches and drains aren't maintained - result 3 floods in last 10 years. Councils and Environment agency must be brought to task to do their job and the houses built on the flood plain removed.
Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 10:21pm Tue 15 Apr 08
That's the trouble with attempting to sue the irresponsible.
That's the trouble with attempting to sue the irresponsible.
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!