Home
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Today's most viewed
EDITOR'S CHOICE

FIND A DATE
Use our Two's Company section to find a date or maybe something more permanent


ON ME HEAD
TEDDY Into your sport then check out the Sport Editor's blog


KNOW YOUR FATE
HoroscopesWant to know what life has in store? Check out our horoscopes


ON YER BIKE
On Yer BikeGet the view from the gutter with cycling group Cyclox in Oxfordshire


VOTE

See the results of previous votes

Is the Government right to upgrade cannabis from a Class C drug to a Class B?
Yes
No
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
Director banned for landfill failings

The director of a west Oxfordshire company has been ordered to pay £6,000 costs and banned from being a company director for five years after a prosecution by the Environment Agency.

Thomas Smyth, of Solihull, Birmingham, sole director of Selectface Ltd, which ran a landfill site at Enstone Quarry, near Chipping Norton, was found guilty at Witney Magistrates' Court of failing to comply with a closure notice and three counts of breaches of waste management licence conditions at the site in 2005 and 2006.

Selectface failed to submit a pollution prevention and control permit application, which would have allowed it to continue disposing of waste at the landfill site, by a November 2004 deadline.

The company also failed to pay annual subsistence fees to the agency for 2005 and the agency required a report to be submitted to ensure continued proper management of the landfill, but Selectface failed to do so.

Joe Cuthbertson, investigating officer for the Environment Agency, said: "Mr Smyth's company was responsible for a series of offences.

"Landfill sites such as Enstone Quarry can produce methane, a greenhouse gas, and leachate, a contaminated liquid, which pose a risk to groundwater.

"Landfills require extensive management and environmental monitoring. Mr Smyth's failure to submit this important data means we have been unable to measure the site's effect on the environment.

"We will now be carrying out and funding our own monitoring of the site."

6:35pm Friday 9th May 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 6:56pm Fri 9 May 08
Following the logic for litigation purposes.

The water companies could be sued for neglgently supplying contaminated drinking water.

Or else they could be sued for knowingly supplying contaminated drinking water.

If they cannot be sued for either there is your public health concern.

If the defendant is found to have contaminated the water table see the public health concern above,if the defendant is found to have not contaminated the water table to a degree that is a public health concern then should he be prosected at all?

Now consider the dumping of toxic ssh in a lake,which by definition is the exposed water table.

Consider that and the foreign owned company running the incinerator at a cost to you.
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
'
Oxford search
Powered by Powered by Fish4
weather

Direct Delivery
Photo Sales
Order prints from our newspapers
Oxford United
Read what others are saying and join the U's most popular forum
Reader Holidays
Exclusive to this site and are not available on the high street
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network